netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] bnxt_en: Pass RoCE app priority to firmware.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170111.104624.1616254027007040020.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:46:24 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     michael.chan@...adcom.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] bnxt_en: Pass RoCE app priority to
 firmware.

From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:12:38 -0500

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
> index 35a0d28..f2630cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ struct bnxt_cos2bw_cfg {
>  
>  #define HWRM_STRUCT_DATA_SUBTYPE_HOST_OPERATIONAL	0x0300
>  
> +#define ETH_P_ROCE		0x8915

There's also a similar define in the qedr infiniband driver, this doesn't
make much sense.

Please add this to if_ether.h, and reference it from there in the drivers.

Thanks.