[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKFLi=6Nt0hr59zA1BpFNH+_q_kU3eR+F6WFOBwFJ03-RzaEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:17:35 -0800
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] bnxt_en: Pass RoCE app priority to firmware.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:46 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:12:38 -0500
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
>> index 35a0d28..f2630cc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
>> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ struct bnxt_cos2bw_cfg {
>>
>> #define HWRM_STRUCT_DATA_SUBTYPE_HOST_OPERATIONAL 0x0300
>>
>> +#define ETH_P_ROCE 0x8915
>
> There's also a similar define in the qedr infiniband driver, this doesn't
> make much sense.
>
> Please add this to if_ether.h, and reference it from there in the drivers.
>
My colleague informed me that he has submitted a patch to do that
through the rdma tree:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=148217575500983&w=2
But it hasn't been merged yet. I can drop this patch now and wait for
the RDMA patch to show up on net-next. Or I make the change later to
use the common define when the RDMA patch is merged. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists