[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6da8254b-11b2-aa0d-9640-ca73e30bcc0f@synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:04:45 +0000
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC: <alexandre.torgue@...com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
<lars.persson@...s.com>, <niklass@...s.com>,
<peppe.cavallaro@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] stmmac: rename it to synopsys
Às 3:45 PM de 1/12/2017, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:39:47 +0000
>
>> In my understanding the advantage is to prepare the future.
>
> If the driver is named foo or bar, yet in both cases loads and
> properly attaches to the user's device, the user does not care.
Of course. Although my car works I like to open the hood a see it clean and
organized. Gives the user more confidence.
>
> Therefore, there is no bonafide benefit to the user.
>
> You aren't getting past that point.
>
> You also are not addressing the pain this will cause for long
> term maintainence of this driver.
I am aware. I can co-maintain it if current maintainers wish it, no problem with
that. My activity at Synopsys in mainline contribution, so it is part of my job.
>
> I'm the one who does all of the backporting of stmmac bug fixes to
> -stable, so I for one care a lot about this.
>
> You are making more work for me and lots of other people by renaming
> this driver and I don't think you are considering that at all.
>
I understand, it is a lot of work. I volunteer to help.
Joao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists