[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac5fe140-e52a-ff5c-dafe-2d6841b07560@mojatatu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:18:20 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
paulb@...lanox.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, mrv@...atatu.com, hadarh@...lanox.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, roid@...lanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user
cookies
On 17-01-15 10:01 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 03:01:19PM CET, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>> +cls_set_class(struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long *clp,
>
> ??
>
>> unsigned long cl)
>> {
>> unsigned long old_cl;
>> -
>> +
>
> ??
>
>> tcf_tree_lock(tp);
>> old_cl = __cls_set_class(clp, cl);
>> tcf_tree_unlock(tp);
>> -
>> +
>
> ??
>
>> return old_cl;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static inline int tcf_em_early_end(struct tcf_ematch *em, int result)
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -
>> +
>
> ??
>
All these things with "??" were annoying whitespace and stylistic
things my fingers couldnt resist. It is legit to include such changes
in a patch when touching the code (as long as not a bug fix).
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists