lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170117.154006.1457576513883871851.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:40:06 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     kafai@...com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Fix test_lru_sanity5() in test_lru_map.c

From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:17:29 -0800

> test_lru_sanity5() fails when the number of online cpus
> is fewer than the number of possible cpus.  It can be
> reproduced with qemu by using cmd args "--smp cpus=2,maxcpus=8".
> 
> The problem is the loop in test_lru_sanity5() is testing
> 'i' which is incorrect.
> 
> This patch:
> 1. Make sched_next_online() always return -1 if it cannot
>    find a next cpu to schedule the process.
> 2. In test_lru_sanity5(), the parent process does
>    sched_setaffinity() first (through sched_next_online())
>    and the forked process will inherit it according to
>    the 'man sched_setaffinity'.
> 
> Fixes: 5db58faf989f ("bpf: Add tests for the LRU bpf_htab")
> Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

Applied, thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ