netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bc3f6bc4-2896-0ba0-35f4-198204f9317d@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:52:15 -0500
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com, paulb@...lanox.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
        mrv@...atatu.com, hadarh@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
        roid@...lanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user
 cookies

On 17-01-16 02:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Jamal, please don't mix coding style and real changes.
>
> Have one patch that adds the user cookies and one that cleans up the
> coding style stuff.
>
> Thanks.
>

I will separate those changes (gives me an opportunity to make
more stylistic changes).

Having said that: Is this rule really cast in stone?;->
I have seen many other people (including myself) sneak in whitespace
changes and other trivialities in a general change. I thought the rule
was to not do such things for bug fixes.

cheers,
jamal