netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170117.102426.1738397298019104514.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:24:26 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jhs@...atatu.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com, paulb@...lanox.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
        mrv@...atatu.com, hadarh@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
        roid@...lanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for
 user cookies

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:52:15 -0500

> Having said that: Is this rule really cast in stone?;->
> I have seen many other people (including myself) sneak in whitespace
> changes and other trivialities in a general change. I thought the rule
> was to not do such things for bug fixes.

Sneaking patches that do things they shouldn't past me doesn't make
it the new rule.