[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+sbYW0+Z2X+_BqG=QNBSgc0Qsk1S9sZYieUuN05PjF5or4NkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:42:00 +0530
From: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>,
Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for bnxt_re V4 10/21] RDMA/bnxt_re: Support for CQ verbs
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> It is better to use already existing macros - min()
> cq->max_cql = min(entries, MAX_CQL_PER_POLL);
>
> I afraid that you can't avoid the respinning, you have more than month
> till merge window.
>
> Can you please remove useless wrappers and try to reuse kernel macros?
Leon,
Thanks for your comments. I will include your both comments in the
next patch set.
Doug,
Is it ok if I send out the V5 now after re-basing against for-4.11
branch or should i wait for your comments on V4?
Thanks,
Selvin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists