[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170124084645.GA4201@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:46:45 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Joe Stringer <joe@....org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <arnaldo.melo@...il.com> wrote:
> > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift
> >> > could wrap.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> >>
> >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok.
> >
> > I could process these patches, if that would help,
>
> Thanks for the offer.
> I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next,
> but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can.
> Dan,
> can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ?
> please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject.
>
Sure.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists