[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170202.215407.606581158337251076.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 21:54:07 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
maowenan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: Fix lack of reference count on PHY driver
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:46:43 -0800
> From: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
>
> There is currently no reference count being held on the PHY driver,
> which makes it possible to remove the PHY driver module while the PHY
> state machine is running and polling the PHY. This could cause crashes
> similar to this one to show up:
...
> Keep references on the PHY driver module right before we are going to
> utilize it in phy_attach_direct(), and conversely when we don't use it
> anymore in phy_detach().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
> [florian: rebase, rework commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
I think grabbing the module reference is the only easy fix we
can do for now.
Hot plugging PHYs and notifications and all of that business is
net-next material.
Florian, do you need to respin this with the workqueue or whatever
suggestion Russell made?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists