[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1486504716.2581.8.camel@sandisk.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:58:50 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"sean.hefty@...el.com" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
"niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com"
<niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"dennis.dalessandro@...el.com" <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
"ira.weiny@...el.com" <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 00/11] HFI Virtual Network Interface Controller (VNIC)
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 21:44 +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> This is Ethernet - not IP - encapsulation over a non-InfiniBand device/protocol.
That's more than clear from the cover letter. In my opinion the cover letter
should explain why it is considered useful to have such a driver upstream
and what the use cases are of encapsulating Ethernet frames inside RDMA
packets.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists