[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1702111354440.1601@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:12:44 +0200 (EET)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: xfrm_neigh_lookup and dst->path
Hello,
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:04:34AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > For now I installed common handler, just like
> > xfrm_neigh_lookup. BTW this function has problem from
> > commit f894cbf847c9, it looks like dst is wrongly provided,
> > first arg should be dst->path.
>
> Yes, this should use dst->path of course. I really wonder why
> nobody noticed this for the last five years.
IMHO, xfrm_neigh_lookup is not used often. If used,
it should be from a place before skb->dst xforms are popped in
xfrm_output_one, i.e. somewhere before the output processing.
I see that dst_neigh_lookup*() is used mostly in xmit handlers
of tunnel devices, I assume, after xfrm_output_one().
Not sure for br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge().
I'm trying to fix this code but we have the
same problem as in xfrm_confirm_neigh: to find address
of last tunnel. Should we use the same loop?
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists