lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2072664575.96405.1486995217363.JavaMail.zimbra@tpip.net>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:13:37 +0100 (CET)
From:   Andreas Schultz <aschultz@...p.net>
To:     Harald Welte <laforge@...filter.org>
Cc:     pablo <pablo@...filter.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lionel Gauthier <Lionel.Gauthier@...ecom.fr>,
        openbsc <openbsc@...ts.osmocom.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] gtp: merge gtp_get_net and
 gtp_genl_find_dev



----- On Feb 6, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Harald Welte laforge@...filter.org wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:37:09PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
>> Both function are always used together with the final goal to
>> get the gtp_dev. This simplifies the code by merging them together.
> 
> Ok, some code restructuring / unification, seems useful.
> 
> However:
> 
>> -			netdev_dbg(dev, "GTPv0-U: update tunnel id = %llx (pdp %p)\n",
>> -				   pctx->u.v0.tid, pctx);
>> +			pr_debug("GTPv0-U: update tunnel id = %llx (pdp %p)\n",
>> +				 pctx->u.v0.tid, pctx);
> 
> (and other related changes) appear to be purely cosmetic and should thus
> be unrelated to the function merging described in the change log
> message.

The dev argument has been removed from the surrounding function.
However, for those debug message having the network device information
is use full. I've modified the code in v3 a bit to keep the debug message.

Andreas

> 
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge@...filter.org>                 http://netfilter.org/
> ============================================================================
>  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
>   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
>    on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ