[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2072664575.96405.1486995217363.JavaMail.zimbra@tpip.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:13:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schultz <aschultz@...p.net>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@...filter.org>
Cc: pablo <pablo@...filter.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Lionel Gauthier <Lionel.Gauthier@...ecom.fr>,
openbsc <openbsc@...ts.osmocom.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] gtp: merge gtp_get_net and
gtp_genl_find_dev
----- On Feb 6, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Harald Welte laforge@...filter.org wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:37:09PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
>> Both function are always used together with the final goal to
>> get the gtp_dev. This simplifies the code by merging them together.
>
> Ok, some code restructuring / unification, seems useful.
>
> However:
>
>> - netdev_dbg(dev, "GTPv0-U: update tunnel id = %llx (pdp %p)\n",
>> - pctx->u.v0.tid, pctx);
>> + pr_debug("GTPv0-U: update tunnel id = %llx (pdp %p)\n",
>> + pctx->u.v0.tid, pctx);
>
> (and other related changes) appear to be purely cosmetic and should thus
> be unrelated to the function merging described in the change log
> message.
The dev argument has been removed from the surrounding function.
However, for those debug message having the network device information
is use full. I've modified the code in v3 a bit to keep the debug message.
Andreas
>
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge@...filter.org> http://netfilter.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
> architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
> on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists