netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mpls: Add support for netconf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Feb 2017 07:53:32 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mpls: Add support for netconf

On 2/20/17 3:01 AM, Robert Shearman wrote:
> On 18/02/17 01:36, David Ahern wrote:
>> Add netconf support to MPLS. Allows userpsace to learn and be notified
>> of changes to 'input' enable setting per interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>>  include/uapi/linux/netconf.h   |   1 +
>>  include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h |   2 +
>>  net/mpls/af_mpls.c             | 212
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  net/mpls/internal.h            |   2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netconf.h b/include/uapi/linux/netconf.h
>> index 45dfad509c4d..159d91c9c2a3 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/netconf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netconf.h
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ enum {
>>      NETCONFA_MC_FORWARDING,
>>      NETCONFA_PROXY_NEIGH,
>>      NETCONFA_IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN,
>> +    NETCONFA_MPLS_INPUT_ENABLED,
> 
> How about removing "MPLS_" the name? That way it would be usable by
> other AFs too, e.g. for the disable_ipv6 sysctl. Perhaps "ENABLED" is
> redundant as well.


I could drop the MPLS to NETCONFA_INPUT_ENABLED; just NETCONFA_INPUT is
not very descriptive.

disable_ipv6 has a completely different meaning, so re-use there does
not seem appropriate.

Thanks for the review.