[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1487719522-42844-2-git-send-email-jarno@ovn.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:25:22 -0800
From: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@....org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jarno@....org, fgao@...ai8.com, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] netfilter: nf_ct_expect: Change __nf_ct_expect_check() return value.
Commit 4dee62b1 ("netfilter: nf_ct_expect: nf_ct_expect_insert()
returns void") inadvertently changed the successful return value of
nf_ct_expect_related_report() from 0 to 1 due to
__nf_ct_expect_check() returning 1 on success. Prevent this
regression in the future by changing the return value of
__nf_ct_expect_check() to 0 on success.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@....org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
index d6ace69..4b2e1fb 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static inline int __nf_ct_expect_check(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect)
struct net *net = nf_ct_exp_net(expect);
struct hlist_node *next;
unsigned int h;
- int ret = 1;
+ int ret = 0;
if (!master_help) {
ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ int nf_ct_expect_related_report(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect,
spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock);
ret = __nf_ct_expect_check(expect);
- if (ret <= 0)
+ if (ret < 0)
goto out;
nf_ct_expect_insert(expect);
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists