[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1488478282.23555.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 19:11:22 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Removing GENL_ID_GENERATE breaks userspace API
On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 17:50 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> you have removed GENL_ID_GENERATE in 4.10, but that is actually
> breaking userspace API.
>
> commit a07ea4d9941af5a0c6f0be2a71b51ac9c083c5e5
> Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 24 14:40:02 2016 +0200
>
> genetlink: no longer support using static family IDs
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/genetlink.h
> b/include/uapi/linux/genetlink.h
> index 5512c90af7e3..d9b2db4a29c6 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/genetlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/genetlink.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ struct genlmsghdr {
> /*
> * List of reserved static generic netlink identifiers:
> */
> -#define GENL_ID_GENERATE 0
> #define GENL_ID_CTRL NLMSG_MIN_TYPE
>
> Since the GENL_ID_GENERATE is in include/uapi/ I would have expected
> that you leave this in. For us, you just broke userspace API with
> this change.
Huh. It makes no sense to be using it nor ever did, but I guess we can
add it back with a comment saying that it's actually needed - send a
patch?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists