netdev - Re: [Patch net] bonding: use ETH_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c215a583-0433-d087-be34-e90adc05ac43@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:36:47 -0500
From:   Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     daznis@...il.com, lists2009@...rfbargle.com,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] bonding: use ETH_MAX_MTU as max mtu

On 2017-03-02 3:24 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> This restores the ability of setting bond device's mtu to 9000.
>
> Fixes: 91572088e3fd ("net: use core MTU range checking in core net infra")
> Reported-by: daznis@...il.com
> Reported-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@...rfbargle.com>
> Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Apologies, I'm a bit late to the party, direct CC didn't land in inbox 
because of duplicate suppression or perhaps a greedy mail filtering rule 
(*grumble*)... Too late to ack, but yeah, that's necessary. I *think* 
the team driver may also require the same treatment. It calls 
ether_setup() without anything setting max_mtu as well.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com