netdev - Re: [Patch net] bonding: use ETH_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170306134048.GC1822@nanopsycho.orion>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:40:48 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        daznis@...il.com, lists2009@...rfbargle.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net] bonding: use ETH_MAX_MTU as max mtu

Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:36:47PM CET, jarod@...hat.com wrote:
>On 2017-03-02 3:24 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> This restores the ability of setting bond device's mtu to 9000.
>> 
>> Fixes: 91572088e3fd ("net: use core MTU range checking in core net infra")
>> Reported-by: daznis@...il.com
>> Reported-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@...rfbargle.com>
>> Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>
>Apologies, I'm a bit late to the party, direct CC didn't land in inbox
>because of duplicate suppression or perhaps a greedy mail filtering rule
>(*grumble*)... Too late to ack, but yeah, that's necessary. I *think* the
>team driver may also require the same treatment. It calls ether_setup()
>without anything setting max_mtu as well.

Jarod, could you please send the fix? Thanks.