netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net] net: Work around lockdep limitation in sockets that use sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 08 Mar 2017 23:06:25 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     dhowells@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] net: Work around lockdep limitation in sockets
 that use sockets

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:04:44 +0000

> Fix the general case by:
> 
>  (1) Double up all the locking keys used in sockets so that one set are
>      used if the socket is created by userspace and the other set is used
>      if the socket is created by the kernel.
> 
>  (2) Store the kern parameter passed to sk_alloc() in a variable in the
>      sock struct (sk_kern_sock).  This informs sock_lock_init(),
>      sock_init_data() and sk_clone_lock() as to the lock keys to be used.
> 
>      Note that the child created by sk_clone_lock() inherits the parent's
>      kern setting.
> 
>  (3) Add a 'kern' parameter to ->accept() that is analogous to the one
>      passed in to ->create() that distinguishes whether kernel_accept() or
>      sys_accept4() was the caller and can be passed to sk_alloc().
> 
>      Note that a lot of accept functions merely dequeue an already
>      allocated socket.  I haven't touched these as the new socket already
>      exists before we get the parameter.
> 
>      Note also that there are a couple of places where I've made the accepted
>      socket unconditionally kernel-based:
> 
> 	irda_accept()
> 	rds_rcp_accept_one()
> 	tcp_accept_from_sock()
> 
>      because they follow a sock_create_kern() and accept off of that.

I guess this is fine, but I think you can use one of the two "sk_padding"
bits in struct sock instead of making the structure larger.