netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: aquantia: set net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58C724E9.9090602@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:02:01 -0400
From:   David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pavel.Belous@...antia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: aquantia: set net_device mtu when mtu is
 changed

On 03/13/2017 03:56 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:50:50 -0400
> 
>> On 03/13/2017 02:09 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>
>>> Date: Wed,  8 Mar 2017 16:33:21 -0500
>>>
>>>> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
>>>> updated.  As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
>>>>
>>>> Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
>>>> assignment ndev->mtu = new_mtu;  This is not true in the case where the driver
>>>> has a ndo_change_mtu routine.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 5513e16421cb ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Fixes for aq_ndev_change_mtu")
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Pavel Belous <Pavel.Belous@...antia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I see that my patch:
>>
>> "net: ethernet: aquantia: call set_irq_affinity_hint before free_irq"
>>
>> has been applied to net, but I don't see that this patch has been applied.
> 
> It is marked as "changes requested" in patchwork, because you were asked to
> do the restart label removal in a separate patch.
> 


Sorry, I was not clear.  I was trying to ask if your "Applied, thanks" reply
(above) was meant for this email thread.  I believe it was meant for the
set_irq_affinity_hint patch.

Thanks,

-DA