[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c025cd44-c8a2-1236-803a-5dc39315f2e3@synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:34:21 -0700
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "nicolas.pitre@...aro.org" <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/3] irq: Add flags to request_percpu_irq function
On 03/23/2017 10:42 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> In the next changes, we track the interrupts but we discard the timers as
> that does not make sense. The next interrupt on a timer is predictable.
>
> But, the API request_percpu_irq does not allow to pass a flag, hence specifying
> if the interrupt type is a timer.
>
> Solve this by passing a 'flags' parameter to the function and change all the
> callers to pass IRQF_TIMER when the interrupt is a timer interrupt, zero
> otherwise.
>
> For now, in order to prevent a misusage of this parameter, only the IRQF_TIMER
> flag is a valid parameter to be passed to the request_percpu_irq function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com> # for arch/arc, arc_timer bits
Powered by blists - more mailing lists