netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] liquidio: allocate RX buffers in OOM conditions in PF and VF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:47:18 -0700
From:   "Burla, Satananda" <Satananda.Burla@...ium.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "Manlunas, Felix" <Felix.Manlunas@...ium.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Vatsavayi, Raghu" <Raghu.Vatsavayi@...ium.com>,
        "Chickles, Derek" <Derek.Chickles@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] liquidio: allocate RX buffers in OOM conditions
 in PF and VF

The 03/22/2017 19:37, David Miller wrote:
> From: Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...ium.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:31:13 -0700
> 
> > From: Satanand Burla <satananda.burla@...ium.com>
> >
> > Add workqueue that is periodically run to try to allocate RX buffers in OOM
> > conditions in PF and VF.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Satanand Burla <satananda.burla@...ium.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...ium.com>
> 
> Applied, but I'm really not so sure you want to poll these queue states
> 4 times a second all the time.
> 
> Why don't you trigger the workqueue when you actually get an allocation
> failure?
That is certainly a better option. We will incorporate that in the
coming series.
-- 
Thanks
Satanand