netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ftgmac100: Mostly rewrite the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170331215652.GA27307@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 23:56:52 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ftgmac100: Mostly rewrite the driver

> They are incremental, but some of them are trivial and in the end
> it's the end result that matters but yes I could probably split some
> misc stuff, rx path, tx path, and more misc.

Hi Ben

Trivial patches are good. They are easy to review. You should be
aiming for patches which are obviously correct, where ever possible.
Refactoring existing code often has a lot of obviously correct
patches, and a few complex patches which take some effort to review.

       Andrew