[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490997565.8750.39.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:59:25 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] sock: correctly test SOCK_TIMESTAMP in
sock_recv_ts_and_drops()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
It seems the code does not match the intent.
This broke packetdrill, and probably other programs.
Fixes: 6c7c98bad488 ("sock: avoid dirtying sk_stamp, if possible")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 8e53158a7d957ea2a480cc449606dca2480b1259..66349e49d468646ce724485bb8e74952825f0d6c 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2250,7 +2250,7 @@ static inline void sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
if (sk->sk_flags & FLAGS_TS_OR_DROPS || sk->sk_tsflags & TSFLAGS_ANY)
__sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb);
- else if (unlikely(sk->sk_flags & SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
+ else if (unlikely(sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP)))
sk->sk_stamp = skb->tstamp;
else if (unlikely(sk->sk_stamp == SK_DEFAULT_STAMP))
sk->sk_stamp = 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists