netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/10] ftgmac100: Upgrade to NETIF_F_HW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1491953765.7236.28.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:36:05 +1000
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ftgmac100: Upgrade to NETIF_F_HW_CSUM

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 08:06 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:27 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > > I'll fix it in a next spin if Dave wants it that way but
> > > otherwise
> > > I'm keen to leave it as it is.
> > 
> > Please fix this and respin.
> > 
> > Meanwhile get the coding style rules changed if you disagree with
> > them.  A patch series review is not the place to argue about your
> > disagreement with the coding style rules.
> 
> I will fix.

Funny thing is, I think the code is wrong :)

I should call the helper when I don't recognize the protocol type
in the IP header, not just when the main skb protocol type is not IP.

BTW. I'm not too familiar with how encapsulation works these days. I
wouldn't throw at that HW anything other than unencapsulated packets
for HW checksumming. Is checking skb->protocol to be IP and
ip_hdr(skb)->protocol to be IP, UDP or TCP enough ? IE. Will the latter
especially return the outer header ?

Cheers,
Ben.