[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419115428.GB3444@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:54:28 +0200
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Sørensen, Stefan 
        <Stefan.Sorensen@...ctralink.com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dan.carpenter@...cle.com" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dp83640: don't recieve time stamps twice
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:28:34AM +0000, Sørensen, Stefan wrote:
> Here we still hold rx_lock while during the callback, wouldn't it be
> beneficial to release that first?
Yes, your are right.
Do you want to post a fix?  If not, I will, but later on this week.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
