[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170420.160227.1855463512293087492.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:02:27 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     richardcochran@...il.com
Cc:     Stefan.Sorensen@...ctralink.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dp83640: don't recieve time stamps twice
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:31:35 +0200
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:16:56AM +0000, Sørensen, Stefan wrote:
>> You are correct that these lines was added accidentally.
> 
> Can we please fix this in another way?  There is no need to hold the
> spin lock during the callback into the networking stack.  Instead, how
> about the following diff, which also fixes the other call site...
Oops, I read this too late.
I already applied and pushed out Dan's fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
