[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL2PR07MB230655E4217E619BABCA54D18D1B0@BL2PR07MB2306.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:50:55 +0000
From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"gerlitz.or@...il.com" <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
"jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"mitch.a.williams@...el.com" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"jogreene@...hat.com" <jogreene@...hat.com>,
"Dupuis, Chad" <Chad.Dupuis@...ium.com>,
"Rangankar, Manish" <Manish.Rangankar@...ium.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 04/14] i40e: dump VF information in debugfs
> > I surely wouldn't want to write a million lines of code just to
> > provide such a detailed abstraction.
>
> So now the argument has gone from "it's not possible" to "it's going to be a
> HUGE amount of code."
Nothing here's is strictly impossible - you can always create a simulated HW
model in SW, and have a one-to-one mapping with the HW entities.
But "unreasonable amount of code" comes very close to it.
> I wonder what the next argument will be when I shoot this one down.
>
> If you simply don't want to do the hard work necessary to implement this
> properly, which is fine, just say so.
Nope, I don't mind doing the work. What I would appreciate is some
constructive suggestions on a seemingly feasible approach that might work.
I feel like I've been bashed enough for one day. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists