netdev - Re: [net-next 04/14] i40e: dump VF information in debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170420.163548.662307112452546016.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com
Cc:     jiri@...nulli.us, gerlitz.or@...il.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, mitch.a.williams@...el.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        jogreene@...hat.com, Chad.Dupuis@...ium.com,
        Manish.Rangankar@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 04/14] i40e: dump VF information in debugfs

From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:12:59 +0000

> I surely wouldn't want to write a million lines of code just to
> provide such a detailed abstraction.

So now the argument has gone from "it's not possible" to "it's going
to be a HUGE amount of code."

I wonder what the next argument will be when I shoot this one down.

If you simply don't want to do the hard work necessary to implement
this properly, which is fine, just say so.