[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUbuzie86Cf96Q9F53UiamJixr-aVkAKtgvZFtiKPngUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:39:28 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should not be settable from userspace
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:19 PM, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> Fix by checking for the flag and failing with EINVAL.
>
I am still not sure about this. There are a few unused bits in
this flag, we simply ignore the rest, right? Why should we
reject this one instead of all of those we don't use?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists