[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170428130347.53hagk77wh6scmcs@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:03:48 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
David Lebrun <david.lebrun@...ouvain.be>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] lwtunnel: fix error path in lwtunnel_fill_encap()
We recently added a check to see if nla_nest_start() fails. There are
two issues with that. First, if it fails then I don't think we should
call nla_nest_cancel(). Second, it's slightly convoluted but the
current code returns success but we should return -EMSGSIZE instead.
Fixes: a50fe0ffd76f ("lwtunnel: check return value of nla_nest_start")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
diff --git a/net/core/lwtunnel.c b/net/core/lwtunnel.c
index 5cbed3816229..cfae3d5fe11f 100644
--- a/net/core/lwtunnel.c
+++ b/net/core/lwtunnel.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ int lwtunnel_fill_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate)
{
const struct lwtunnel_encap_ops *ops;
struct nlattr *nest;
- int ret = -EINVAL;
+ int ret;
if (!lwtstate)
return 0;
@@ -212,10 +212,11 @@ int lwtunnel_fill_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate)
lwtstate->type > LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX)
return 0;
- ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
nest = nla_nest_start(skb, RTA_ENCAP);
if (!nest)
- goto nla_put_failure;
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
rcu_read_lock();
ops = rcu_dereference(lwtun_encaps[lwtstate->type]);
if (likely(ops && ops->fill_encap))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists