[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7t37coxvys.fsf@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 01 May 2017 14:39:39 -0400
From:   Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 binutils] Add BPF support to binutils...
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 13:22:00 -0400
>
>> x86-64:
>>   Running /home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/bpf/bpf.exp ...
>>   FAIL: jump
>>   FAIL: call
>>   FAIL: imm64a
>>   Running /home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp ...
>
> I cannot reproduce this, can you show what it says in the:
>
> 	/home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas.log
>
> file near the "FAIL" cases?
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -dr dump.o >dump.out 2>gas.stderr}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 108:	95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 	exit$"
line   " 108:	95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 	exit	"
FAIL: jump
Same style of error for call and imm64a.  After reverting and then
re-applying your patch, the FAILs all go away, so I must have broken
these files somehow.  Sorry for the false alarm.
-Aaron
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
