[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170501.145011.2010615531122694032.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 14:50:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: aconole@...heb.org
Cc: ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 binutils] Add BPF support to binutils...
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 14:39:39 -0400
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>
>> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
>> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 13:22:00 -0400
>>
>>> x86-64:
>>> Running /home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/bpf/bpf.exp ...
>>> FAIL: jump
>>> FAIL: call
>>> FAIL: imm64a
>>> Running /home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp ...
>>
>> I cannot reproduce this, can you show what it says in the:
>>
>> /home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas.log
>>
>> file near the "FAIL" cases?
>
> Executing on host: sh -c {/home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -dr dump.o >dump.out 2>gas.stderr} /dev/null (timeout = 300)
> spawn [open ...]
> regexp_diff match failure
> regexp "^ 108: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit$"
> line " 108: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit "
> FAIL: jump
>
>
> Same style of error for call and imm64a. After reverting and then
> re-applying your patch, the FAILs all go away, so I must have broken
> these files somehow. Sorry for the false alarm.
Great, thanks for checking.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists