netdev - Re: net/smc and the RDMA core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <d9214af6-1c6f-9f95-fc00-3e4a316b4f81@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2017 14:25:59 +0200
From:   Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net/smc and the RDMA core

On 05/01/2017 06:33 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Ursual, hi netdev reviewers,
> 
> how did the smc protocol manage to get merged without any review 
> on linux-rdma at all?  As the results it seems it's very substandard
> in terms of RDMA API usage, e.g. it neither uses the proper CQ API
> nor the RDMA R/W API, and other will probably find additional issues
> as well.
>
Hi Christoph,

We have been posting SMC-R patches on netdev since 2015, there was never 
any secrecy about it. Still sorry for omitting linux-rdma, will include 
with future postings from now on. 
Of course, we are open to any further code reviews, so if you can point 
out specific issues, we will be happy to work with you to get them 
addressed!

Regards, Ursula