[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5909E75B.30305@bfs.de>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 16:21:15 +0200
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
CC: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: remove redundant null check on head
Am 03.05.2017 15:50, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> head is previously null checked and so the 2nd null check on head
> is redundant and therefore can be removed.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1399505 ("Logically dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> net/sched/cls_matchall.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> index 2efb36c08f2a..dee469fed967 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> @@ -203,8 +203,7 @@ static int mall_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>
> *arg = (unsigned long) head;
> rcu_assign_pointer(tp->root, new);
> - if (head)
> - call_rcu(&head->rcu, mall_destroy_rcu);
> + call_rcu(&head->rcu, mall_destroy_rcu);
> return 0;
>
> err_replace_hw_filter:
if someone cares .. the err=0 in the the line above the patch is also useless
because err is never used again. Merging both if will save 1 indent level.
err = mall_replace_hw_filter(tp, new, (unsigned long) new);
if (err && tc_skip_sw(flags) )
goto errout;
just my impression,
re
wh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists