lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 09 May 2017 07:34:42 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To:     Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath10k: remove unnecessary code

Hi Arend,

Quoting Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>:

> On 9-5-2017 7:33, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com> writes:
>>
>>> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
>>> So these tests will always evaluate as false and therefore the _return_
>>> will never be executed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
>>
>> I don't understand the commit log, especially what does "The name of an
>> array used by itself" mean?
>
> The array fields in struct wmi_start_scan_arg that are checked here are
> fixed size arrays so they can never be NULL.
>
> Maybe that helps rephrasing this commit message.
>

Definitely. Thank you!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva






Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ