netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath10k: remove unnecessary code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170509070040.Horde.6Ij5mVFBAtwRRwxv1IUZfj_@gator4166.hostgator.com>
Date:   Tue, 09 May 2017 07:00:40 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath10k: remove unnecessary code

Hi Kalle,

Quoting Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>:

> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com> writes:
>
>> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
>> So these tests will always evaluate as false and therefore the _return_
>> will never be executed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
>
> I don't understand the commit log, especially what does "The name of an
> array used by itself" mean?
>

Let me correct that and I'll send the patch again.

Thanks!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva