[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHgaXdL7GcVzs+ANPke_NywhcgHbe_fzi1sTDEy+Ni1-o82GYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 03:08:37 +0530
From: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, ast@...com,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit
Finally finished testing.
"test_bpf: Summary: 314 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [274/306 JIT'ed]"
Will send the patch after code refactoring. Thanks for all the help
you guys. I really really appreciate it.
Special thanks to Kees and Daniel. :)
Best,
Shubham Bansal
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Shubham Bansal
> <illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote:
>> What do you guys suggest i should implement it? I am almost done with
>> my current implementation but if you think I should change it to the
>> way David suggested, its better to suggest now before I send the
>> patch.
>
> I'd say send what you have right now, as it's a good starting point
> for future work. I'll be curious to see the benchmarks, etc. It can be
> a base for further optimization.
>
> Thanks for chipping away at this!
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists