netdev - Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLeCB-H0nkVtpJN5SSz4r4idnKJbnV+rO610nw-o98wCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 10:44:07 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, ast@...com,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Shubham Bansal
<illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote:
> Finally finished testing.
>
> "test_bpf: Summary: 314 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [274/306 JIT'ed]"

Nice work! Glad you've been chipping away at this. Thanks!

-Kees

>
> Will send the patch after code refactoring. Thanks for all the help
> you guys. I really really appreciate it.
>
> Special thanks to Kees and Daniel. :)
>
> Best,
> Shubham Bansal
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Shubham Bansal
>> <illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote:
>>> What do you guys suggest i should implement it? I am almost done with
>>> my current implementation but if you think I should change it to the
>>> way David suggested, its better to suggest now before I send the
>>> patch.
>>
>> I'd say send what you have right now, as it's a good starting point
>> for future work. I'll be curious to see the benchmarks, etc. It can be
>> a base for further optimization.
>>
>> Thanks for chipping away at this!
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>> --
>> Kees Cook
>> Pixel Security



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security