lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <591A07A1.1030006@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 21:55:13 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, ast@...com
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit

On 05/13/2017 11:38 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Finally finished testing.
>
> "test_bpf: Summary: 314 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [274/306 JIT'ed]"

What are the missing pieces and how is the performance compared
to the interpreter?

Thanks,
Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ