[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170515.142655.1279898304018190599.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:26:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mahesh@...dewar.net
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
maheshb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: avoid dad-failures for addresses with NODAD
From: Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 17:03:39 -0700
> From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>
> Every address gets added with TENTATIVE flag even for the addresses with
> IFA_F_NODAD flag and dad-work is scheduled for them. During this DAD process
> we realize it's an address with NODAD and complete the process without
> sending any probe. However the TENTATIVE flags stays on the
> address for sometime enough to cause misinterpretation when we receive a NS.
> While processing NS, if the address has TENTATIVE flag, we mark it DADFAILED
> and endup with an address that was originally configured as NODAD with
> DADFAILED.
>
> We can't avoid scheduling dad_work for addresses with NODAD but we can
> avoid adding TENTATIVE flag to avoid this racy situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
This doesn't apply cleanly to the net tree, please respin.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists