netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 May 2017 06:16:07 -0700
From:   Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>,
        wg@...ndegger.com, mario.huettel@....net,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to
 function

Hi Alexandre,

On 05/16/2017 01:00 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/05/2017 at 20:51:30 -0700, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> On 05/15/2017 06:50 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> Looks good, added to linux-can-next.
>>
>> Isn't this a fix for linux-can instead?
>>
>> At least it would make no sense to me to have the upgraded M_CAN driver in
>> Linux 4.12 without this fix.
>>
>
> The related suspend mode on the sama5d2 is not present in v4.12 so I
> think this can wait v4.13.
>

Agreed!

Thanks for the explanation.

Regards,
Oliver