[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95c9a6b9-ac60-caa1-416d-c74e1aea08f4@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:57 -0400
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad
On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400
>
>> As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not
>> removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count
>> is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number
>> of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled.
> ...
>> Remedy it by using the same logic introduced in
>> 7bb11dc9f59d in __bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(), so sysfs, procfs and
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> netlink all report the number of active ports.
>
> I think you mean to reference commit 0622cab0341c here not 7bb11dc9f59d.
D'oh, yes, you are entirely correct. Should I submit a v2 with that
correction?
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists