[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170519.191705.577061587119695633.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 19:17:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarod@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:57 -0400
> On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
>> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400
>>
>>> As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not
>>> removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave
>>> count
>>> is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the
>>> number
>>> of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled.
>> ...
>>> Remedy it by using the same logic introduced in
>>> 7bb11dc9f59d in __bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(), so sysfs, procfs and
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> netlink all report the number of active ports.
>> I think you mean to reference commit 0622cab0341c here not
>> 7bb11dc9f59d.
>
> D'oh, yes, you are entirely correct. Should I submit a v2 with that
> correction?
Yes, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists