netdev - Re: [PATCH v9 06/15] mlx5: Replace PCI pool old API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 11:26:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     romain.perier@...labora.com
Cc:     leon@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, dledford@...hat.com,
        sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, stas.yakovlev@...il.com,
        jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peter.senna@...labora.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/15] mlx5: Replace PCI pool old API

From: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:53:36 +0200

> Hello,
> 
> 
> Le 23/05/2017 à 09:27, Leon Romanovsky a écrit :
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Romain Perier wrote:
>>> The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commit replaces the PCI pool old
>>> API by the appropriate function with the DMA pool API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
>>> Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
>>> Tested-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>>  include/linux/mlx5/driver.h                   |  2 +-
>>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Who is supposed to merge this patch series?
>>
>> Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> Each maintainer of the corresponding subsystem, can take a patch, I
> guess. No ?

It might be easier to accumulate acks and you submit them as a series,
in my opinion.