lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 13:37:33 +0200
From:   Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     leon@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, dledford@...hat.com,
        sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, stas.yakovlev@...il.com,
        jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peter.senna@...labora.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/15] mlx5: Replace PCI pool old API

Hello,


Le 23/05/2017 à 17:26, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:53:36 +0200
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> Le 23/05/2017 à 09:27, Leon Romanovsky a écrit :
>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Romain Perier wrote:
>>>> The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commit replaces the PCI pool old
>>>> API by the appropriate function with the DMA pool API.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>>>  include/linux/mlx5/driver.h                   |  2 +-
>>>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> Who is supposed to merge this patch series?
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
>> Each maintainer of the corresponding subsystem, can take a patch, I
>> guess. No ?
> It might be easier to accumulate acks and you submit them as a series,
> in my opinion.
That's what I did already, no ?

Romain

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ