lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 14:37:51 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] samples/bpf: bpf_load.c order of prog_fd[] should
 correspond with ELF order

An eBPF ELF file generated with LLVM can contain several program
section, which can be used for bpf tail calls.  The bpf prog file
descriptors are accessible via array prog_fd[].

At-least XDP samples assume ordering, and uses prog_fd[0] is the main
XDP program to attach.  The actual order of array prog_fd[] depend on
whether or not a bpf program section is referencing any maps or not.
Not using a map result in being loaded/processed after all other
prog section.  Thus, this can lead to some very strange and hard to
debug situation, as the user can only see a FD and cannot correlated
that with the ELF section name.

The fix is rather simple, and even removes duplicate memcmp code.
Simply load program sections as the last step, instead of
load_and_attach while processing the relocation section.

When working with tail calls, it become even more essential that the
order of prog_fd[] is consistant, like the current dependency of the
map_fd[] order.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
---
 samples/bpf/bpf_load.c |   19 +++++--------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
index 74456b3eb89a..a91c57dd8571 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
@@ -516,16 +516,18 @@ static int do_load_bpf_file(const char *path, fixup_map_cb fixup_map)
 		processed_sec[maps_shndx] = true;
 	}
 
-	/* load programs that need map fixup (relocations) */
+	/* process all relo sections, and rewrite bpf insns for maps */
 	for (i = 1; i < ehdr.e_shnum; i++) {
 		if (processed_sec[i])
 			continue;
 
 		if (get_sec(elf, i, &ehdr, &shname, &shdr, &data))
 			continue;
+
 		if (shdr.sh_type == SHT_REL) {
 			struct bpf_insn *insns;
 
+			/* locate prog sec that need map fixup (relocations) */
 			if (get_sec(elf, shdr.sh_info, &ehdr, &shname_prog,
 				    &shdr_prog, &data_prog))
 				continue;
@@ -535,26 +537,15 @@ static int do_load_bpf_file(const char *path, fixup_map_cb fixup_map)
 				continue;
 
 			insns = (struct bpf_insn *) data_prog->d_buf;
-
-			processed_sec[shdr.sh_info] = true;
-			processed_sec[i] = true;
+			processed_sec[i] = true; /* relo section */
 
 			if (parse_relo_and_apply(data, symbols, &shdr, insns,
 						 map_data, nr_maps))
 				continue;
-
-			if (memcmp(shname_prog, "kprobe/", 7) == 0 ||
-			    memcmp(shname_prog, "kretprobe/", 10) == 0 ||
-			    memcmp(shname_prog, "tracepoint/", 11) == 0 ||
-			    memcmp(shname_prog, "xdp", 3) == 0 ||
-			    memcmp(shname_prog, "perf_event", 10) == 0 ||
-			    memcmp(shname_prog, "socket", 6) == 0 ||
-			    memcmp(shname_prog, "cgroup/", 7) == 0)
-				load_and_attach(shname_prog, insns, data_prog->d_size);
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* load programs that don't use maps */
+	/* load programs */
 	for (i = 1; i < ehdr.e_shnum; i++) {
 
 		if (processed_sec[i])

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ