[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170601153704.GA1680@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:37:04 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"jsorensen@...com" <jsorensen@...com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
"yi1.li@...ux.intel.com" <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next 4/6] net/mlx5: FPGA, Add basic support for Innova
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 04:09:06PM +0000, Ilan Tayari wrote:
> > For IPSec, this is already in the kernel.
> > See this patchset:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg162876.html
>
> Sorry, I pointed at the RFC by mistake.
>
> This is the relevant pull request:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/752707/
This is connecting ipsec to a netdev, while Innova seems to be a
network connected ipsec accelerator configured using IP packets.
Those two things don't seem to be the same.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists