[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:51:48 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: do not bypass the mvpp22_port_mii_set
function
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:45:35PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:36:15 +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > The mvpp22_port_mii_set() function was added by 2697582144dd, but the
> > function directly returns without doing anything. This return was used
> > when debugging and wasn't removed before sending the patch. Fix this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Please add:
>
> Fixes: 2697582144dd ("net: mvpp2: handle misc PPv2.1/PPv2.2 differences")
>
> with this:
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
OK, will do.
> I am wondering if we shouldn't Cc: stable as well. I don't think we
> have seen issues on our side because U-Boot does the necessary
> initialization, but people using other bootloaders might have issues.
Yes, that might be safer to cc stable. I'll do this as well.
Thanks,
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists