| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UeN7BK94wgU=LiD9CAo0ihrFgv2bZLFrTtr_+bgSbswxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:24:36 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Michael Werner <werner@...lsio.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Patrick J Cramer <patrick.j.cramer@...el.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Bob Shaw <Bob.Shaw@....com>, h <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Amir Ancel <amira@...lanox.com>,
Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] net/cxgb4: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING
flag
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> wrote:
> From: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
>
> cxgb4 Ethernet driver now queries Root Complex Port to determine if it can
> send TLPs to it with the Relaxed Ordering Attribute set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
So I am pretty sure this patch doesn't work with patch 2. We need to
update it so that it doesn't check the root complex but instead checks
itself to see if it is allowed to use relaxed ordering.
What we need here is the ability to detect if relaxed ordering is
disabled, and if so take the steps needed to enable peer to peer
relaxed ordering without enabling relaxed ordering to the root
complex. Do I have that right Casey?
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/sge.c | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4.h
> index e88c180..478f25a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4.h
> @@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ enum { /* adapter flags */
> USING_SOFT_PARAMS = (1 << 6),
> MASTER_PF = (1 << 7),
> FW_OFLD_CONN = (1 << 9),
> + ROOT_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (1 << 10),
> };
>
> enum {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
> index 38a5c67..fbfe341 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
> @@ -4628,6 +4628,7 @@ static int init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> u32 v, port_vec;
> #endif
> + struct pci_dev *root;
>
> printk_once(KERN_INFO "%s - version %s\n", DRV_DESC, DRV_VERSION);
>
> @@ -4726,6 +4727,22 @@ static int init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> adapter->msg_enable = DFLT_MSG_ENABLE;
> memset(adapter->chan_map, 0xff, sizeof(adapter->chan_map));
>
> + /* If possible, we use PCIe Relaxed Ordering Attribute to deliver
> + * Ingress Packet Data to Free List Buffers in order to allow for
> + * chipset performance optimizations between the Root Complex and
> + * Memory Controllers. (Messages to the associated Ingress Queue
> + * notifying new Packet Placement in the Free Lists Buffers will be
> + * send without the Relaxed Ordering Attribute thus guaranteing that
> + * all preceding PCIe Transaction Layer Packets will be processed
> + * first.) But some Root Complexes have various issues with Upstream
> + * Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed Ordering Attribute set.
> + * So we check our Root Complex to see if it's flaged with advice
> + * against using Relaxed Ordering.
> + */
> + root = pci_find_pcie_root_port(adapter->pdev);
> + if (pcie_get_relaxed_ordering(root))
> + adapter->flags |= ROOT_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING;
> +
> spin_lock_init(&adapter->stats_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&adapter->tid_release_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&adapter->win0_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/sge.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/sge.c
> index f05f0d4..ac229a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/sge.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/sge.c
> @@ -2571,6 +2571,7 @@ int t4_sge_alloc_rxq(struct adapter *adap, struct sge_rspq *iq, bool fwevtq,
> struct fw_iq_cmd c;
> struct sge *s = &adap->sge;
> struct port_info *pi = netdev_priv(dev);
> + int relaxed = !(adap->flags & ROOT_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING);
>
> /* Size needs to be multiple of 16, including status entry. */
> iq->size = roundup(iq->size, 16);
> @@ -2624,8 +2625,8 @@ int t4_sge_alloc_rxq(struct adapter *adap, struct sge_rspq *iq, bool fwevtq,
>
> flsz = fl->size / 8 + s->stat_len / sizeof(struct tx_desc);
> c.iqns_to_fl0congen |= htonl(FW_IQ_CMD_FL0PACKEN_F |
> - FW_IQ_CMD_FL0FETCHRO_F |
> - FW_IQ_CMD_FL0DATARO_F |
> + FW_IQ_CMD_FL0FETCHRO_V(relaxed) |
> + FW_IQ_CMD_FL0DATARO_V(relaxed) |
> FW_IQ_CMD_FL0PADEN_F);
> if (cong >= 0)
> c.iqns_to_fl0congen |=
> --
> 1.9.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists